Analisis Karya Miniatur Ekosistem Sebagai Asesmen Formatif dalam Mengukur Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik di Kelas V PKBM Imam Bukhari
Analysis of Miniature Ecosystem Projects as Formative Assessment in Measuring Students' Conceptual Understanding in Class V at PKBM Imam Bukhari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17667985Keywords:
asesmen formatif, miniatur ekosistem, pemahaman konsep, berpikir tingkat tinggi, pendidikan nonformalAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karya miniatur ekosistem sebagai bentuk asesmen formatif dalam mengukur pemahaman konsep peserta didik di sekolah nonformal. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode studi artefak, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Subjek penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas V Program Paket A di PKBM Imam Bukhari Karanganyar. Data dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña yang meliputi reduksi, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asesmen berbasis proyek melalui pembuatan miniatur ekosistem efektif dalam menilai kemampuan siswa untuk mengaplikasikan, mensintesis, dan merepresentasikan konsep ekosistem secara autentik. Siswa yang mampu mentransfer pemahaman dari model fisik ke model konseptual menunjukkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS). Namun, ditemukan kesenjangan dalam representasi interaksi sistemik, terutama pada peran dekomposer dan siklus nutrien. Selain itu, tantangan implementasi mencakup keterbatasan waktu guru, beban administrasi, serta motivasi dan kesiapan manajemen diri siswa. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa asesmen formatif berbasis proyek dapat menjadi sarana efektif untuk menilai dan memperdalam pemahaman konseptual siswa jika disertai umpan balik reflektif dan penekanan pada akurasi ilmiah, bukan estetika semata.
References
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022
Keeley, P. (2008). Science Formative Assessment: 75 Practical Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young Students’ Reasoning About Ecosystems: The Role of Systems Thinking, Knowledge, Conceptions, and Representation. Research in Science Education, 52, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
Neumann, K. (2014). Formative Assessment. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 376–378). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_82
Nugraha, I., Anggraeni, S., & Amprasto, A. (2023). Promoting Students’ Conceptual Change on the Concept of Ecosystem through PDEODE Teaching Strategy. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 28(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v28i1.36257
Ozata Yücel, E., & Özkan, M. (2015). Determining the Middle School 7th Grade Students’ Levels of Understanding the Concept of Ecosystem via Worksheets. Education and Science, 40(179), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4765
Sholihah, F. N., & Prihatiningtyas, S. (2021). Creating Miniature Ecosystem to Increase Student Learning Outcomes Through Guided Discovery Learning. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi dan Terapan, 6(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v6i1.1970
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating Assessment with Learning: What Will It Take to Make It Work? In The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning (pp. 53–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zidan, Z., Maftuhah, M., Yusti, D., Rahmat, A., Riandi, R., & Kusnadi, K. (2023). Learning Strategies on Ecosystem Concepts and Environmental Change: A Pedagogical Study Analysis. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 6(2), 145–155.* https://doi.org/10.17509/asim.v6i2.59777
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion Press.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
Widiastuti, N., & Sari, D. A. (2021). Implementasi asesmen formatif berbasis proyek dalam pembelajaran IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 6(2), 145–156.
Kemdikbud. (2020). Panduan Penilaian Pendidikan Kesetaraan Paket A, B, dan C. Direktorat Pendidikan Masyarakat dan Pendidikan Khusus.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kreswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Orion Press.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Atriyanto Fahrurrohman, Abdussalam Jabaruddin Yamjirin, Firlita Nurul Kharisma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
